Leading US Imam and Professor: Muslims Can Take Property of “Filthy” Christians and J

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lady Marva
    Senior Member
    • Wednesday, June 17, 2015
    • 13321

    #1

    Leading US Imam and Professor: Muslims Can Take Property of “Filthy” Christians and J

    Rhodes College: liberal Arts http://www.rhodes.edu/content/about-rhodes

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015...nd-jews-video/
    Imam Yasir Hadhi is a college professor in Tennessee.
    Hadhi says Christians are “shirk” and “evil” and Muslims can take their property.
    yasir-qadhi

    This prominent Muslim tells his supporters are “filthy” and “impure.”
    Cofda reported:


    Yasir Qadhi (aka Abu Ammaar Yasir Kazi) is an American imam and college professor who is described by a 2011 New York Times Magazine essay as “one of the most influential conservative clerics in American Islam.”

    In his sermon/lecture in the YouTube audio below, Qadhi begins by calling Christians “shirk” for being “polythesists” who believe in the Triune God (three persons in one God), instead of Islam’s “monotheist” god Allah.

    Then Qadhi really steps up his verbal abuse. He says, since “there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah wuzza wuzza,” Christians are “by necessity and by definition … the most evil of all evils.” Like all “unbelievers” and “polytheists,” Christians are “filthy.” They are “najusa” (feces, urine) — “a filthy impure dirty substance.”

    Qadhi declares that the prophet Mohammad — and by extension all Muslims — “has been commanded to do jihad.”

    What is jihad?

    Jihad “is a means to establish monotheism on the land.” The prophet had said, “I have been commanded to fight the people until they” convert to Islam. But “if they don’t [convert to Islam,] their life and property are halal [free for the taking] for the Muslims.”
    Video at link.
  • Gingersnap
    Resident stylistic consultant
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 24058

    #2
    The particular flavor of Islam that is funded by Saudi Arabia and promoted relentlessly today is one that considers all non-believers as sub-human. How else could you butcher men and rape and enslave Christian, pagan, or Jewish women?

    For whatever reason. Mohammed could not persuade many of his fellows to convert to his religion. He did try. When it became obvious that they would not, the second part of the Quran superseded the first and killing, maiming, enslavement, rape, and ruinous taxation were suddenly lawful.

    This in contrast to Christianity. The New Testament and the New Covenant sweeps away most, but not all, of the laws of the Old Testament. Christ didn't kill the woman found in adultery - he told her to repent and live. Mohammed killed many. Christ told his followers to turn the other cheek but Mohammed told his followers to kill those resisted. Christ told his followers to protect children but Mohammed advised raping them if they were girls. Muslim men will have a never ending supply of nubile boys in Paradise. Christians will get to worship God. (“At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven”.)

    Who can look at the mayhem Muslims have created all through the world today and not understand the Crusades? Christians waited several hundred years before mounting a mass attack. Several hundred years of Muslims killing, raping, and enslaving Europeans before they got it together to push Muslims out of conquered European lands.

    I talked with a rural woman from the area of Yugoslavia (hard to know what to call it today). She had crosses tattooed all over her neck, down her chest, on her hands,and arms (and told me she had them elsewhere). Her daughter did too. Eventually our friendship grew and she told me that her people did this to prevent Muslim men from raping and enslaving them. It's not that the men would avoid them - it was that they would kill them immediately if push came to shove.

    I never forgot that. They were disfiguring tattoos, not enhancing tattoos.
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

    Comment

    • scott
      Go-to Guru
      • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
      • 15799

      #3
      Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
      The particular flavor of Islam that is funded by Saudi Arabia and promoted relentlessly today is one that considers all non-believers as sub-human. How else could you butcher men and rape and enslave Christian, pagan, or Jewish women?

      For whatever reason. Mohammed could not persuade many of his fellows to convert to his religion. He did try. When it became obvious that they would not, the second part of the Quran superseded the first and killing, maiming, enslavement, rape, and ruinous taxation were suddenly lawful.

      This in contrast to Christianity. The New Testament and the New Covenant sweeps away most, but not all, of the laws of the Old Testament. Christ didn't kill the woman found in adultery - he told her to repent and live. Mohammed killed many. Christ told his followers to turn the other cheek but Mohammed told his followers to kill those resisted. Christ told his followers to protect children but Mohammed advised raping them if they were girls. Muslim men will have a never ending supply of nubile boys in Paradise. Christians will get to worship God. (“At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven”.)

      Who can look at the mayhem Muslims have created all through the world today and not understand the Crusades? Christians waited several hundred years before mounting a mass attack. Several hundred years of Muslims killing, raping, and enslaving Europeans before they got it together to push Muslims out of conquered European lands.

      I talked with a rural woman from the area of Yugoslavia (hard to know what to call it today). She had crosses tattooed all over her neck, down her chest, on her hands,and arms (and told me she had them elsewhere). Her daughter did too. Eventually our friendship grew and she told me that her people did this to prevent Muslim men from raping and enslaving them. It's not that the men would avoid them - it was that they would kill them immediately if push came to shove.

      I never forgot that. They were disfiguring tattoos, not enhancing tattoos.
      Here's an interesting article on that.

      "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
      -John Locke

      "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
      -Newman

      "Grievance groups are playing King of the Hill."
      -Newman

      Comment

      • Gingersnap
        Resident stylistic consultant
        • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
        • 24058

        #4
        Originally posted by scott View Post
        Here's an interesting article on that.

        https://inherity.wordpress.com/tag/t...atian-tattoos/
        The gal I met was in her mid-thirties (back in the 90s) so they must have doing it past 1935.
        "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

        Comment

        • Tom Servo
          Area Man
          • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
          • 5898

          #5
          Well fuck that Imam and the camel he came on.
          “Any sufficiently advanced capitalism is indistinguishable from rent seeking.” ~ =j

          Comment

          Working...